Disinfo News /disinfonews Disinfo News - Disinfo Information Mon, 30 Jan 2017 17:26:41 +0000 en-US hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=4.2.2 Researchers have known for decades that cannabis kills cancer cells… yet the cover-up continues /disinfonews/2017-01-30-researchers-have-known-for-decades-that-cannabis-kills-cancer-cells.html /disinfonews/2017-01-30-researchers-have-known-for-decades-that-cannabis-kills-cancer-cells.html#respond Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000 After decades of attempts to find a cure for cancer and billions of dollars spent on cancer research, we are still fighting the war on this disease. While heart disease remains the number one killer of Americans, cancer is rapidly catching up. With so much money and time having gone into cancer research, one may ask why finding a solution is taking so long. To tell you the truth, scientists may have found several natural cancer cures decades ago – one of them being cannabis oil.

Since as early as 1974, researchers have known that THC, the active chemical in cannabis, shrinks or destroys tumors in rodents. Researchers at the Medical College of Virginia found that THC slowed the growth of three kinds of cancer in mice: lung and breast cancer, as well as virus-induced leukemia. Without any mention in the mainstream media, the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) quickly shut down the study and destroyed its results.

Cannabinoids in marijuana proven to inhibit tumor growth and kill cancer cells

Years later, researchers in Madrid confirmed these early results after successfully destroying incurable brain tumors in rats by injecting them with cannabinoids. They found that THC inhibits the growth of blood vessels that supply glucose to tumors, thereby halting tumor growth and prompting cancer cells to die-off.

To test for harmful biochemical or neurological effects, the Spanish researchers, led by Dr. Manuel Guzman of Complutense University, also administered large doses of THC to healthy rats. They found no adverse health effects. Again, no major U.S. newspapers ran this groundbreaking news.

There are still a lot of uncertainties about whether vaporizing or ingesting cannabis oil in combination with lifestyle and diet changes can be used as an alternative cancer treatment. But with many testimonials from those who have been helped, and several attempts to get cannabis oil allowed through the court system, the world might reach a conclusion soon.

Two large hospitals in Israel – Sheba and Abarbanel – are involved in successful human clinical trials and treatments with cannabis for several maladies, according to Organic and Healthy.

As with many other promising natural treatments for cancer, research moves slowly, as the pharmaceutical cancer industry, backed up by governments, isn’t too keen on shutting down its multi-billion dollar chemotherapy business. They will do anything in their power to withhold the public from other, less damaging and cheaper cures. (RELATED: Learn more about cancer solutions at CancerSolutions.news)

Could cannabis oil be a safer cancer treatment for children too?

While it is not recommended to feed your baby cannabis oil, a few years ago, cannabinoid oil reduced the massive, centrally located and inoperable brain tumor of an 8-month-old within two months. The child’s father kept pushing Dr. William Courtney, who was quite skeptical about cannabis treatments, for non-traditional treatments based on marijuana. The baby was given cannabis oil via his pacifier, and was completely cured within eight months, as reported by Organic and Healthy.

After seeing the astonishing results with his own eyes, Dr. Courtney pointed out that the success of the cannabis approach means that children and adults no longer need to undergo the cruelties of surgery and long-term side effects that come from very high doses of chemotherapy or radiation.

Stay informed about more cannabis medicine news at Medical Marijuana Update, and read about natural medicine cures at CURES.news.






/disinfonews/2017-01-30-researchers-have-known-for-decades-that-cannabis-kills-cancer-cells.html/feed 0
Even President Nixon had a higher average approval rating than Obama /disinfonews/2017-01-30-even-president-nixon-had-a-higher-average-approval-rating-than-obama.html /disinfonews/2017-01-30-even-president-nixon-had-a-higher-average-approval-rating-than-obama.html#respond Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000 Former President Barack Obama’s average approval rating was 47.9 percent while he was in office. That is a lower approval rating than Richard Nixon, who resigned; and George Bush, who’s approval rating plummeted down to 25 percent near the end of his term. There are only 3 Presidents who have had lower average approval ratings than Obama. Gerald Ford was at 47.2 percent, Jimmy Carter had 45.5 percent, and Harry Truman had a 45.4 percent approval rating. (RELATED: Find more Obama news at Obama.fetch.news)

Gallup released their analysis on Friday, publishing the average approval rating for all twelve Presidents who have taken office post World War II. After Obama’s first year, he only achieved majority approval once more during his first term. His last spike in approval came in his 16th quarter in office, around the time he was re-elected. Support for Obama dipped dramatically down to the 40 percent range shortly after his second term started. Obama’s approval remained low until regaining the majority level in his final year as President.

Obama’s approval dipped as low as 38 percent at times when debt, unemployment, and the Islamic State were in focus. Negotiations over the debt ceiling limit and downgrading the US credit rating played a factor at the time of his lowest approval. Obama didn’t generate enough support for legislation to address the weak employment situation.

After the capture of Osama bin Laden in May of 2011, Obama gained a modest surge in support. His support level otherwise moved very gradually when it did change. Obama failed to achieve high ratings during his presidency, but he also avoided extreme lows. The Gallup study points out that the US didn’t suffer any major wars or international incidents which would have created a rally effect behind the former President.

Obama’s lackluster support may reflect his governing during a time where many were unsatisfied with the state of the nation. There was a low amount of trust between the people and the government, and diminished confidence in major US institutions. Obama may not have helped people confide in government. Some of his policies, including the Affordable Care Act, were heavily frowned upon. Obama also used his executive orders to advance his immigration policy after failing to accomplish that goal through the legislative process. (RELATED: Find more White House news at Whitehouse.news)

The overall approval ratings average is an indication of how well a president did their job, but ratings at the end of one’s presidency often have the greatest impact on how they will be remembered. Americans believe that Obama will typically be judged more positively than negatively by history, possibly even better than several of his predecessors who had much higher average approval ratings. Only time will tell if that projection holds true.

How are the Gallup polls collected?

The results for the most recent Gallup poll were based on telephone interviews conducted between October 20, 2016, and January 19, 2017. The Gallup US Daily survey consisted of randomly sampling 42,122 adults from all fifty states, and Washington D.C. All samples were 18 years or older and living in the US at the time.

The margin of sampling error is ±1 percentage points, at the 95 percent confidence level for results based on the total sample of national adults. The reported margins for error in sampling includes a computed design effect for weighting.

The minimum quota for each sample of national adults included 70 percent correspondence by cellphone, and 30 percent coming from landlines. Landline and cellular phone numbers were selected using random digit dial methods. Additional minimum quotas for the Gallup polls factored in time zones and regions.






/disinfonews/2017-01-30-even-president-nixon-had-a-higher-average-approval-rating-than-obama.html/feed 0
Total hypocrisy: Obama routinely bombed 5 out of the 7 countries Trump just banned, but the media said nothing /disinfonews/2017-01-30-obama-bombed-5-out-of-the-7-countries-trump-just-banned-but-the-media-said-nothing.html /disinfonews/2017-01-30-obama-bombed-5-out-of-the-7-countries-trump-just-banned-but-the-media-said-nothing.html#respond Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000 While the lying media is freaking out over President Trump‘s (temporary) travel ban for seven Middle Eastern countries deemed security risks, they didn’t give a damn about Obama bombing them.

(Article by Chris Menahan from InformationLiberation.com)

Though the media is currently in a tizzy because Trump’s executive order held up around 300 people at airports, Obama’s bombings were reported as completely reasonable to bring about peace.

Out of the seven countries that were banned by President Trump last Friday, five were bombed by the Obama administration: Syria, Iraq, Yemen, Libya and Somalia.

1 Where were the George Soros funded organizations protesting the “nearly 100 attacks” that have occurred since 2009 in Yemen “resulting in the deaths of hundreds of militants, but also many civilians?”

Did Chuck Schumer shed a tear for the 62 Syrian troops killed and 100 more wounded that the Obama administration “accidentally bombed” in 2016?

Did Schumer openly weep when the Obama administration was “duped into attacking Somali troops” and killed 22 of them in an air strike late last year?

It’s fine for the Nobel Peace Prize winning President to bomb these people in their own countries, but for President Trump to temporarily prevent them from traveling to our country to keep America safe is “un-American” and “unconstitutional.”


Read more at: InformationLiberation.com

Find more news about the threat of terrorism at Terrorism.news.

/disinfonews/2017-01-30-obama-bombed-5-out-of-the-7-countries-trump-just-banned-but-the-media-said-nothing.html/feed 0
FACT CHECK: So-called “Muslim ban” doesn’t even effect 87% of the world’s 1.6 billion Muslim population /disinfonews/2017-01-30-fact-check-so-called-muslim-ban-doesnt-even-effect-87-of-the-worlds-1-6-billion-muslim-population.html /disinfonews/2017-01-30-fact-check-so-called-muslim-ban-doesnt-even-effect-87-of-the-worlds-1-6-billion-muslim-population.html#respond Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000 Eighty-seven percent of the world’s 1.6 billion Muslims are not affected by President Donald Trump’s Friday decision to temporarily withhold visas from citizens of seven Middle Eastern countries.

Approximately thirteen percent of the world’s Muslims, or 199.4 million out of up to 1.6 billion, live in those seven countries, according to a 2015 Pew Research Report, “The Future of World Religions: Population Growth Projections, 2010-2050.”

(Article by Michael Patrick Leahy, republished from BreitBart.com)

So Trump’s reform policy only impacts one of every eight Muslims worldwide.

The Muslim population in each of these seven countries, estimated by Pew Research as of 2010, is: Iran (74 million), Sudan (33.6 million), Iraq (31.7 million), Yemen (24 million), Syria (20.4 million), Somalia (9.3 million), and Libya (6.4 million).

The 90-day temporary block on new visas does not apply to citizens of the six countries with the largest Muslim populations, as determined by Pew Research— Indonesia (209 million), India (176 million), Pakistan (167 million), Bangladesh (134 million), Nigeria (77 million), and Egypt (76 million).

It does apply citizens of Iran, the country with the seventh largest Muslim population (74 million).

But it does not apply to citizens of the other top ten Muslim population countries: Turkey (71 million), Algeria (35 million), and Morocco (32 million).

None of the seven countries on which a temporary visa ban has been placed were listed by name in Friday’s, executive order, “Protecting the Nation from Foreign Terrorist Entry Into The United States.”

Instead, the order referenced previous laws and findings that designated three of these countries “state sponsors of terrorism” (Iran, Sudan, and Syria) and four of them (Iraq, Libya, Somalia, and Yemen) as “countries of concern” who are ineligible to participate in the Visa Waiver Program, according to the Visa Waiver Program Improvement and Terrorist Improvement Act of 2015.

The 2015 bill was made law once it was signed by President Barack Obama.

Six of the seven countries to which the temporary visa issuance block applies were designated as “state sponsors of terrorism” or “countries of concern” by previous Democrat administrations. Only one — Iran in 1984 — was designated by a Republican administration.

Syria was first designated as a state sponsor of terrorism during the Jimmy Carter administration on December 29, 1979.

Iran was designated as a state sponsor of terrorism during the Ronald Reagan administration on January 19, 1984.

Sudan was designated as a state sponsor of terrorism during the Bill Clinton administration on August 12, 1993.

Syria and Iraq were labeled “countries of concern”  ineligible to participate in the Visa Waiver Program in the original Visa Waiver Program Improvement and Terrorist Improvement Act of 2015 signed into law by President Obama in December 2015.

On Feb. 18, 2016, the Obama administration’s Department of Homeland Security added Libya, Somalia, and Yemen to that list:

The Department of Homeland Security today announced that it is continuing its implementation of the Visa Waiver Program Improvement and Terrorist Travel Prevention Act of 2015 with the addition of Libya, Somalia, and Yemen as three countries of concern, limiting Visa Waiver Program travel for certain individuals who have traveled to these countries.

Pursuant to the Act, the Secretary of Homeland Security had sixty days to determine whether additional countries or areas of concern should be subject to the travel or dual nationality restrictions under the Act. After careful consideration, and in consultation with the Director of National Intelligence and the Secretary of State, the Secretary of Homeland Security has determined that Libya, Somalia, and Yemen be included as countries of concern, specifically for individuals who have traveled to these countries since March 1, 2011. At this time, the restriction on Visa Waiver Program travel will not apply to dual nationals of these three countries. DHS continues to consult with the Department of State and the Office of the Director of National Intelligence to develop further criteria to determine whether other countries would be added to this list.

The executive order also temporarily banned refugees from all countries for 120 days.

Read more at: BreitBart.com

See more coverage of total news hoaxes from the left-wing media at HOAX.news.

/disinfonews/2017-01-30-fact-check-so-called-muslim-ban-doesnt-even-effect-87-of-the-worlds-1-6-billion-muslim-population.html/feed 0
Just as CNN is the king of fake news, the CDC is the king of fake science /disinfonews/2017-01-30-just-as-cnn-is-the-king-of-fake-news-the-cdc-is-the-king-of-fake-science.html /disinfonews/2017-01-30-just-as-cnn-is-the-king-of-fake-news-the-cdc-is-the-king-of-fake-science.html#respond Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000 There are several “fluffers” at CNN and MSNBC that must keep the script exciting upon “delivery” for the people who love fictional news. Some of the top thespians include Wolf Blitzer, Anderson Cooper, Erin Burnett, Chris Hayes, and of course, Rachel Maddow.

From massaging a fake Russian dossier about Trump to caressing the all-too-attractive (imaginary) Russian hackers of the confounded election that went “awry,” the fluffers of fake news are phenomenal at performing their “jobs,” so let us not take anything away from their mad skills.

However, the kings of fake news are nothing but college co-eds compared to the professional hacks, hucksters, charlatans and shills employed at the CDC, the Center for Disease Continuance. There, fake science is bolstered and emboldened by “scientists” and “academics” who have sold their souls to the devil for cold hard cash, and who push the propaganda of the chemical medicine machine better known as the chemical medical industrial complex of the United States of preventable disease epidemics.

The 100 percent synthetic, virtual reality ‘research’ for sheeple who religiously follow scripted, fake CDC science as their shepherd

To put it bluntly, there is no “consensus” on vaccine safety, global warming or the safety of genetically modified organisms in food. Yet, there are several puppets and shills who tell the masses otherwise, declaring that the science has been “settled,” and if you don’t oblige and bow down, then you are “anti-science.” Never, ever question the status quo, they say, or you will be shunned and reprimanded.

Bottom line: The CDC is not working in the best interests of the public it serves, thanks to corporate and “Pharma” lobbying for positions of control in the bureaucracy they have fraudulently influenced for decades, if not since its inception in 1946. After all, the CDC is a for-profit corporation listed on Dun and Bradstreet with a “mission and vision” to take the “health pulse” of the nation regularly, as stated on their website.

CDC scandals, lack of safety research and American-made cover-ups perpetuate chemical medicine’s collateral damage

During the stretch of years from 1999 until now, the CDC has repeatedly lied to the American public, saying that they have removed mercury, contained in the highly toxic compound thimerosal at 50 percent, from all  vaccines. In reality, they have most certainly kept it in influenza vaccines which are aggressively recommended for infants and pregnant mothers. Is the CDC now denying that the flu shot is a vaccine? The swine flu vaccine jab also contains thimerosal (mercury) in its multi-dose vials. Zero research has been done on the safety of mercury in vaccines.

In fact, all the CDC does is refer back to “research” done in the 1930s, which claimed that mercury was safe. Considering how far we’ve come with modern medicine, the 1930s are like the dark ages. Should we believe the CDC if they bring back blood-letting too? If you want the truth about vaccines, you won’t get it from the CDC. They fake the science just like CNN fakes the news – it’s all suited to fit the script that makes Big Pharma a fortune at the expense of human health, life and safety.

Want the non-scripted truth “serum” about vaccines and the damage mercury does to our children, infants and pregnant mothers alike? Check out the new book by Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., Thimerosal: Let the Science Speak: The Evidence Supporting the Immediate Removal of Mercury–a Known Neurotoxin–from Vaccines. Kennedy was recently appointed by President Donald J. Trump to head up the new Vaccine Safety Commission for the United States.

H1N1 Swine Flu hoax promoted by CDC and the World Health Organization (WHO) to sell millions of untested, toxic vaccines

It’s not a joke or a hoax that the CDC makes billions of dollars selling vaccines via fear-based propaganda that millions of Americans literally “buy into” every year. In 2009, it was the Swine Flu hoax that took the world by storm, and the mass media like CNN and the Washington Post (WashPo) helped perpetuate the gargantuan lie. Hundreds of millions of doses of this toxic, mercury-loaded vaccination were ordered to be injected into unsuspecting hypochondriacs across the world. Then, the hoax fell apart at the seams.

Thanks to alternative health news and honest, whistleblowing doctors like Wolfgang Wodarg, a leading health authority in Europe, the drug company campaign of “organized panic” that claimed Swine Flu was a pandemic, ended up failing miserably. Wodarg called the Swine Flu hoax “one of the greatest medical scandals of the century,” and a marketing scam by the CDC and WHO to sell vaccines.

The Zika virus microcephaly hoax perpetuated by CDC propaganda and mass chemical spraying of humans with Naled pesticide

Dial it back to the 1940s, 50s and 60s, when the Zika virus was discovered and then fully documented as a mild viral infection that never, ever caused microcephaly or brain damage. Outbreaks in Oceania and Southeast Asia infected thousands of people, including three-fourths of the population of an island in the Pacific Ocean. This was known as the “Yap epidemic,” and not one single birth defect from Zika was reported. Oops. CNN and the CDC hope you never research that, and most Americans probably won’t. In fact, most Americans are so doped up on fluoridated water and CNN news that they can’t remember true medical history from five months ago, much less 50 years back. Zika is like a head cold, except if you get it, you’re immune to it for life.

Even though deaths from Zika are very rare, CNN and Bill Gates spread propaganda about microcephaly (babies born with abnormally small heads) being quite common, so watch out pregnant women! Be sure to run to your local Walmart or pharmacy and get shot up with some taxpayer funded, experimental vaccine full of mercury that causes autism spectrum disorder.

The Ebola scare, sponsored by WHO and CDC lies, and a push for a mandatory vaccination

You heard it for weeks before and even during last year’s Super Bowl. Ebola is coming to the United States (the CDC literally imported infected doctors and nurses on purpose to jump start it) and millions of Americans are at risk! Look, up in the sky (in Atlanta and New York, actually), it’s Swine flu, no … it’s Bird Flu, no … it’s Ebola! The CDC, World Health Organization and Big Pharma have been attempting to get a “pandemic” off the ground in order to sell millions of toxic vaccinations for some time now.

It worked with Polio, where the CDC had nearly 100 million Americans injected with cancer rather than what they declared was a “safe and effective” vaccine for preventing some random strains of the Polio virus from spreading. Yep, the totally corrupt CDC media broadcasted fake Ebola pandemic news and statistics, just as they did during the fake swine flu pandemic in 2009.

And that, my friends, is why, just as CNN is the king of fake news, the CDC is the king of fake science.

Sources for this article include:









/disinfonews/2017-01-30-just-as-cnn-is-the-king-of-fake-news-the-cdc-is-the-king-of-fake-science.html/feed 0
Glorifying obesity: Buzzfeed tells women that being sized XL and up is ‘normal’ /disinfonews/2017-01-30-glorifying-obesity-buzzfeed-tells-women-that-being-an-xl-and-up-is-average.html /disinfonews/2017-01-30-glorifying-obesity-buzzfeed-tells-women-that-being-an-xl-and-up-is-average.html#respond Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000 Buzzfeed, a Left-wing entertainment company loves to promote feel-good stories and other such tripe. Their recently published story about how the average American woman is now between a size 16 and 18 is surely indicative of that.

Writer Chrissy Mahlmeister proclaims, “A recent study revealed that the average American woman wears a size 16–18, and we want to celebrate that!”

To be clear; just because you are the “average” size does not mean you are a “healthy” size. This is not something we should be celebrating. In the summer of 2016, it was reported that for the first time ever, more than 4 out every 10 women in the United States were obese.

The latest data from the CDC indicates that roughly 40 percent of all women in the US are clinically obese, as are 35 percent of men. Obesity is a problem in this country — and it’s a problem many people, including the mainstream media, are in denial about. [RELATED: Stay current with media’s latest tricks at MediaFactWatch.com]

BMI, waist circumference as indicators of risk

The liberal media loves to criticize the BMI scale. It is an easy target; it doesn’t take into account things like bone density and muscle mass. This is quite true, but the fact remains that BMI is based on average. So, it stands to reason that unless you are above-average in terms of your physique — which most people in this country clearly are not — BMI is still a useful tool for diagnosing potential health risks for the average individual. Is it perfect? Of course not. But for the average person, it is a reasonably accurate predictor of potential disease risk.

It’s also worth noting that in women, BMI tends to underestimate body fatness, rather than overestimate. So, unless you are an actual athlete, BMI is a tool that your doctor can use to help estimate your current health risks fairly accurately.

Even if you still don’t really care for the BMI measurement — there is no escaping your waist measurement. Waist measurement is a respected predictor for the onset of many diseases and health conditions. So, if you think being a size 16 or 18 is not unhealthy, think again. According to the Lane Bryant website, a size 16 equates to  36″ waist circumference, while a size 18 equates to a 38″ waist circumference.  In women, a waist size of 35″ or more is associated with an increased risk of metabolic syndrome. Men with waists of 40″ or more are also at risk. Such large waist measurements are also considered risk factors for diabetes, hypertension and cardiovascular disease. (RELATED: Learn how to prevent disease at Prevention.news)

The health risks of obesity are clear

In addition to the outpouring of statistics provided by the CDC and other official organizations, there are countless scientific studies that show overall, being overweight or obese correlates with an increased risk of mortality, disease and disability.

The CDC states that in addition to increasing the risk of heart disease, diabetes, and hypertension, obesity also increases your risks for: strokes, gallbladder disease, osteoarthritis, chronic inflammation, sleep apnea, breathing difficulty, certain kinds of cancers, poor quality of life and reduced mobility. Obesity also increases the risk for all-cause mortality. [RELATED: Learn more about the CDC at CDC.news]

Some 30 percent of overweight people are currently living with diabetes, and 85 percent of type 2 diabetics are overweight or obese. Some studies have indicated that being slightly overweight increases your risk of diabetes five times, while being obese can raise the risk by up to 60-fold.

You’ve probably heard about that study that claimed being fat actually helped you live longer. While there has been quite a lot of controversy about the validity of the study, even if we were to entertain the thought — that study did not indicate that those extra years lived would be healthy years lived.

A study published by the International Journal of Obesity found that BMI and waist circumference were related to disability, and a decreased chance of recovering from said disability. The study also observed an increase in years of life lost to disability as weight increased. Data from almost 6,000 participants was collected. In terms of years lost to disability, the researchers found that being overweight cost men 5.87 years of life, and cost women 12.82 years. Grade I Obesity (BMI above 30 but below 35) was correlated with a 7-year loss for men and a 15-year loss for women.

So, it seems that even if you do manage to live longer thanks to your extra energy stores, it doesn’t seem that those years will be particularly pleasant.

While the media tells you being fat is “slaying” or whatever, the truth is that obesity is not natural or healthy. “Average” in America means obese, and there are no if’s, and’s or but’s about that.










/disinfonews/2017-01-30-glorifying-obesity-buzzfeed-tells-women-that-being-an-xl-and-up-is-average.html/feed 0
“Muslim ban” a total lie… fact-less media gins up mass hysteria among left-wing zombie trolls… America now a “mob-ocracy” /disinfonews/2017-01-30-muslim-ban-a-total-lie-fact-less-media-gins-up-mass-hysteria-among-left-wing-zombie-trolls.html /disinfonews/2017-01-30-muslim-ban-a-total-lie-fact-less-media-gins-up-mass-hysteria-among-left-wing-zombie-trolls.html#respond Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000 This may come as a shock to anyone stupid enough to still believe the lying left-wing media, but there is no Muslim ban in America. President Trump‘s executive orders, signed last Friday, are only a temporary halting of immigrants and refugees from seven countries with strong ties to international terrorism.

None of those seven countries are among the list of nations from where the largest number of Muslims immigrate to America. Even more, those seven countries were chosen and named by Obama administration officials! (They were chosen by Obama, not by Trump.) Both Obama and former President Jimmy Carter invoked temporary bans on travelers from terror-linked countries, by the way.

Yet the wholly dishonest, anti-America left-wing media has no interest in reporting the truth about any of this. They’re using the executive order to whip up mass hysteria as an emotional weapon against President Trump.

Right on cue — in another perfect example of “journo-terrorism” — the mindless liberal masses unleashed a social media trolling storm to condemn Donald Trump’s so-called “Muslim ban.” But there is no Muslim ban. As has become customary on the left, the trolls pushing the media narrative are completely without any facts whatsoever and argue from a place of mindless outrage rather than reasoned consideration.

What we’re all really witnessing yet again is the complete collapse of the credibility of the left-wing media and its mindless zombie followers. They are all truly unhinged, mentally ill “emotional zombies” who are instantly manipulated into faux outrage on any event the media seeks to contort into hatred directed at Donald Trump.

That’s why much of America isn’t a democracy but a “mob-ocracy” where mobs of mindless zombies are whipped up into fake outrage by a wholly dishonest, lying left-wing media.

Stay informed about the ongoing invasion of the USA at InvasionUSA.news.

Watch this video from Stefan Molyneux to learn what the media isn’t reporting:


And watch this commentary from Paul Joseph Watson for more fact checking:

/disinfonews/2017-01-30-muslim-ban-a-total-lie-fact-less-media-gins-up-mass-hysteria-among-left-wing-zombie-trolls.html/feed 0
How to beat Facebook censorship and stay connected with suppressed news sources /disinfonews/2017-01-29-how-to-beat-facebook-censorship-and-stay-connected-with-suppressed-news-sources.html /disinfonews/2017-01-29-how-to-beat-facebook-censorship-and-stay-connected-with-suppressed-news-sources.html#respond Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000 Mark Zuckerberg is an evil globalist turd who just sued local Hawaiians so he could confiscate their eight acres of land to add to his 700 acres of beach-front property. He also built a massive wall around his entire estate to keep out the local Hawaiians (yet he’s opposed to building a wall on America’s southern border).

Facebook is not only an NSA front that gathers surveillance information on you and your friends, it’s also engaged in heavy censorship of truthful news sources (i.e. the independent media). For example, although Natural News has over 2 million Facebook likes, a typical post only goes to about one half of one percent of that audience.

Some stories are utterly censored outright, including any story that contains phrases such as “vaccine side effects” or “autism and vaccines.” The Facebook censorship algorithms automatically strip out stories on “sensitive” topics that threaten the globalist order. This is exactly the same way China’s communist regime censors all internet posts about Falun Gong or the Tiananmen Square uprising. No one is surprised by the fact the Zuckerberg speaks Chinese and seems to get along great with the communists. I speak Chinese as well, but I’m pro-Taiwan and wholly opposed to the communist regime of mainland China because it is a totalitarian communist regime rooted in human cruelty and oppression. (That doesn’t seem to bother Zuckerberg one bit.)

Today I’ve posted a video that reveals how to beat Facebook censorship by connecting with alternative social media sources like Diaspora (Share.NaturalNews.com), GAB.ai (gab.ai/NaturalNews), GoodGopher.com and Censored.news.

Check out the full video at this link or watch below:





/disinfonews/2017-01-29-how-to-beat-facebook-censorship-and-stay-connected-with-suppressed-news-sources.html/feed 0
How to know when President Trump is WINNING … just listen for the heads exploding on the mentally ill Left /disinfonews/2017-01-28-how-to-know-trump-is-winning-just-listen-for-the-heads-exploding-on-the-mentally-ill-left.html /disinfonews/2017-01-28-how-to-know-trump-is-winning-just-listen-for-the-heads-exploding-on-the-mentally-ill-left.html#respond Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000 I’ve just posted a short commentary video that reveals how to know when Trump is WINNING.

You almost don’t even have to keep track of exactly what he’s doing. Just listen for all the screaming (or heads exploding) on the Left, and you’ll know Trump is doing a great job for America.

That’s because the radical left is not just mentally ill, they’re all haters of America, haters of liberty and haters of truth in news. That’s why they push so much fake news while constantly attacking President Trump with malicious smears and “fabricated facts.”

Watch my commentary below to learn why the Left is going so insane over every single accomplishment of President Trump — the first president in a long time to actually attempt to do something positive for our country.

No teleprompters. No makeup. No special wardrobe. Just independent commentary that isn’t scripted… imagine… REAL news!

/disinfonews/2017-01-28-how-to-know-trump-is-winning-just-listen-for-the-heads-exploding-on-the-mentally-ill-left.html/feed 0
Facebook to start labeling news on your timeline based on liberal-leaning Politifact’s “fact-checking” /disinfonews/2017-01-28-facebook-to-start-labeling-news-on-your-timeline-based-on-liberal-leaning-politifacts-fact-checking.html /disinfonews/2017-01-28-facebook-to-start-labeling-news-on-your-timeline-based-on-liberal-leaning-politifacts-fact-checking.html#respond Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000 Facebook has been at odds with both the right and the left for various reasons over the past few months. What began with silencing conservative opinions via their algorithm has led to absolute cyber chaos in nearly every respect. People on the right feel like Facebook is suppressing their voices. People on the left want Facebook to virtually ban conservative news from being spread through their website. Everyone seems frustrated and what is currently going on sure seems to be making matters even worse.

Over the past few months it has been reported that Facebook is joining forces with a number of “fact-checking” websites in order to determine if stories that are frequently shared on their social media network are real or not. (RELATED: Read more about real fake news at NewsFakes.com)

Alex Heath of Business Insider reports, “To combat fake news, Facebook has teamed up with a shortlist [sic] of media organizations, including Snopes and ABC News.” Heath explains how the process will work, writing, “Starting as a test with a small percentage of its users in the US, Facebook will make it easier to report news stories that are fake or misleading. Once third-party fact-checkers have confirmed that the story is fake, it will be labeled as such and demoted in the News Feed.”

The problem with this is that a number of the fact-checkers that Facebook is teaming with — including Snopes and Politifact — have been proven to have left-leaning biases. So it’s almost guaranteed that this will show through when it comes to determining what is and is not “fake news.”

Facebook should be completely hands-off when it comes to what individuals want to share on their respective profiles. They shouldn’t be telling people what they can and cannot post and they should not be prioritizing news stories based on the opinions of leftists. It’s just a terrible idea all around because it puts people at odds with each other and raises tensions throughout their website.

If something truly is fake, then it is up to the individual to recognize that. There are so many publications that used to be reputable and have sold out recently, it can be a tough task to determine what is or isn’t real. It takes a lot of research and effort to know which outlets are owned by which people. If people want to be informed, though, there are a lot of ways in which that can happen. The last thing we need, though, are biased people determining what we should read. That’s just a recipe for disaster.

Stay informed about more fake news and liberal news hoaxes at HOAX.news.




/disinfonews/2017-01-28-facebook-to-start-labeling-news-on-your-timeline-based-on-liberal-leaning-politifacts-fact-checking.html/feed 0